How the state of “Central California” would vote

The Six States proposal is a wonk’s brain candy. Everybody knows it’ll never pass, but many can’t resist the “what if?”

Fox and Hounds analyzed how the Six States would alter the political map of California and the U.S. Of particular interest to us is what kind of political animal the state of “Central California” would be. 

Surveying senatorial elections back to 2004, they figured Central California, though only narrowly Republican, would have elected Republicans all but once. “The only exception would have been Dianne Feinstein’s reelection bid in 2006, when she would have defeated Richard Mountjoy.”

Surprisingly, though, our Kentucky-sized population of 4.2 million slightly-more-red-then-blue voters would not increase Republican’s presidential chances.

“Why would the Republicans have received so little benefit from breaking up current-California’s Electoral College bulk?” the piece asks. “Because each of the four or five (new) states carried by Obama would have had two additional Senate seats counted in its Electoral College allotment, and those would have roughly offset the small Republican pickup of a single state or two.”

Wonky stuff, as I said. But fun. Read the whole thing here.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Rules. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or fill out this form.
  • Blog Author

    Michael Fitzgerald

    Mike Fitzgerald is The Record’s award-winning metro columnist. His column runs in the paper three times a week. Born in San Francisco, he was raised in Stockton. His column covers diverse beats including, sometimes, the offbeat. Read Full
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • RSS Related Content