An admittedly dumb question

It says in this story that the sequester may close Stockton’s airport tower. I was surprised to learn this does not entail termination of any flights. 

On the contrary, Stockton becomes an “uncontrolled field,” where planes may legally take off and land without an air controller’s guidance.

So — dumb question — what do we need the tower for? Why fund 11 federal employees and the rest of the operation? Doesn’t the legality of uncontrolled fields suggest that the number of (presumably high-paid) tower employees could at least be reduced?

It’d be interesting to see data from other uncontrolled fields in the U.S. Are they sites of perpetual mid-air collisions and carnage? Or do small airports with light traffic manage just fine without Uncle Sam?

Just asking.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Rules. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or fill out this form.
  • Blog Author

    Michael Fitzgerald

    Mike Fitzgerald is The Record’s award-winning metro columnist. His column runs in the paper three times a week. Born in San Francisco, he was raised in Stockton. His column covers diverse beats including, sometimes, the offbeat. Read Full
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • RSS Related Content