U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer’s whistle-stop campaign tour this week brought her to Stockton on Wednesday afternoon. On the van ride between Stockton Metropolitan Airport and the Port of Stockton, I asked her about water, and her take on federal restrictions on Delta water exports. It’s become a campaign issue, and you can read about it in Michael Fitzgerald’s column today, or go to the campaign website for Carly Fiorina, who’s running against Boxer.
This is what Boxer said:
“In California, water has always been a contentious issue, as you know. And to me as a United States Senator my job is to bring all the stakeholders together and avoid the water wars. My opponent keeps attacking me and saying ‘Barbara Boxer isn’t helping farmers.’ Well I am helping farmers, I’m helping everybody, because I’m working with Sen. Feinstein to make sure all the stakeholders are at the table. The suburban/urban users, the fishermen, that is very important for 23,000 jobs. And, also, our farmers, it’s so important to have the water that we need. It’s gotta be done with all of us together, and it has to be a balanced plan …
“For the first time we’ve got an administration that is at the table and we hammered out a really good drought-related plan of how we’re going to meet the farmers’ needs without having to waive any of the protective laws that protect the salmon fisheries. We figured out how to do it …
“So we’re making tremendous progress as we’re working all together, rather than fighting. My opponent wants to fight about water. I want to solve the problem. And working with Sen. Feinstein, we are really making progress on it.”
And on a peripheral canal:
“I’ve never supported it in the past … I’m at: All of us coming up with a plan we can all agree on. But I’ve not supported the peripheral canal.”
Advanced life support: Cutting room floor
Before the city officials announced Tuesday night they would halt advanced life support services in compliance with a deadline announced by the county, I had written something down about how the issue came up during public comment during the Tuesday morning Board of Supervisors meet. But the newest news prevails, and our story from today was heavy on the newest information.
So I’ll paste in a couple of disjointed tidbits from the morning meeting:
John La Rue asked the supervisors why they would prevent trained paramedics on fire engines from working as paramedics upon arrival at an emergency scene, “endangering the lives of innocent taxpayer constituents.” La Rue has a decades-long career in communications, including founding Pac-West Telecomm in Stockton 1980. “How does it make sense?” asked La Rue, who is a volunteer communications consultant for Stockton.
He was one of three speakers to address the board Tuesday morning.
Board Chairman Carlos Villapudua read a statement saying that because of the litigation between the city and county, “the board would not be participating in any public discussion regarding (emergency medical services).”
Tim Runion said his parents live within a mile of a Stockton Fire station. He said they’ve needed paramedics three times, and three times Stockton Fire beat the ambulances to the scene. Runion is a battalion chief for Stockton Fire, but he said he was speaking on behalf of people like his parents in questioning a decision to limit the number of paramedics. “It’s not morally right, and it’s a bad decision,” he said. “And it’s not too late to change.”
Greg Biddle, vice president of Stockton Professional Firefighters Local 456 also called the deadline a threat to public safety.